Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2004 Relative importance of nymphal and adult resource availability for reproductive allocation in Melanoplus sanguinipes (Orthoptera: Acrididae)
David H. Branson
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

A better understanding of the relative effects that nymphal and adult resource availabilities have on reproductive allocation is needed, given the potentially important implications for the prediction of grasshopper population dynamics. I conducted a field experiment to examine the importance of nymphal and adult resource availabilities on reproductive allocation in the grasshopper Melanoplus sanguinipes (Fabricius). Female nymphs were reared on either high or low nymphal resource availability, with watered and ambient-level adult resource treatments. Adult resource treatments were initiated below the carrying capacity, to allow an examination of food limitation effects on reproductive allocation, while minimizing strong density dependent effects. Although nymphs reared with ad libitum resources had higher adult body mass, nymphal resource availability did not affect reproductive allocation or adult survival. Female M. sanguinipes grasshoppers responded to the increased host plant availability in the watered treatment, by increasing reproduction allocation over the course of the experiment. M. sanguinipes females did not reduce vitellogenesis in response to decreased adult resource availability, but completed development of a lower percentage of ovarioles that initiated development. Although resource dynamics in semi-arid grasslands can change rapidly during grasshopper development, there were no direct effects of limited resource availability for developing nymphs that subsequently affected per capita reproduction of adults.

Introduction

Grasshoppers exhibit life history variation in response to a variety of resource availability and quality components (Hewitt 1985; Belovsky & Slade 1995; Joern & Behmer 1997, 1998; Stauffer & Whitman 1997; Branson 2003b) and appear capable of adaptive modifications in resource allocation (de Souza Santos & Begon 1987, Branson 2003a). When resources are limiting to an organism, allocation of resources to reproduction unavoidably leads to a reduction in resource allocation to other activities such as survival or maintenance (Nylin & Gotthard 1998). However, the effect of resource availability on reproductive allocation and survival of grasshoppers, often under resource-limited field conditions, has received little attention (Belovsky & Slade 1995, Branson 2003b). Food limitation for high quality resources often exists when initial population densities are below the carrying capacity (Branson 2003b), as grasshoppers selectively forage on plants to maximize survival and reproduction (Bernays & Chapman 1994).

Nymphal resource availability has frequently been assumed to have limited effects on reproductive allocation and adult mortality, because grasshoppers acquire and allocate resources to reproduction primarily as adults (Moehrlin & Juliano 1998). Correlations between phenotypic characteristics thought to be representative of nymphal or adult conditions (such as femur length and body mass) and life history variation have been inconsistent (MacFarlane & Thorsteinson 1980, Atkinson & Begon 1987, Wall & Begon 1987, Sanchez et al. 1988). Despite the potential importance for understanding grasshopper population dynamics, the effects of nymphal resource availability on reproductive allocation have not been quantified. Branson (2003b) examined reproductive allocation responses to resource availability and population density in the grasshopper Melanoplus sanguinipes (Fabricius) in a field experiment initiated with nymphal grasshoppers, but did not separately examine the effects of nymphal and adult resource availabilities.

Grasshoppers can reduce allocation to reproduction when resources are limiting by decreasing vitellogenesis or increasing oosorption, allowing a higher percentage of resources to be used for other functions such as survival (Chapman 1998, Papaj 2000). Grasshopper ovaries consist of a series of follicles that are capable of developing and producing eggs. Typically not all ovarioles are functional, or developing, at a given time (Bellinger et al. 1987). Vitellogenesis occurs when yolk is deposited into an ovarian follicle, initiating development of the follicle (Chapman 1998). In contrast, oosorption, or resorption, occurs when a developing ovarian follicle stops development and the resources in an ovariole are reincorporated and used for egg production or other functions (Joern & Klucas 1993, Chapman 1998, Danner & Joern 2004).

In this study, I examined the relative importance of nymphal and adult resource availabilities for M. sanguinipes adult survival and reproductive allocation. I reared nymphal female grasshoppers on 2 resource availability levels in an outdoor laboratory and then conducted a 2 × 2 factorial field experiment, with females from the 2 nymphal rearing treatments placed in watered and ambient-level adult resource treatment cages. The first objective was to examine if reduced resource availability for nymphal females affected per capita reproductive allocation or survival of adults. The second objective was to examine how patterns of reproductive allocation changed in response to increased adult host plant availability. The adult resource treatments were initiated below the average carrying capacity at the site to allow an examination of food limitation effects on reproductive allocation, while avoiding strong exploitative competition that can result in high levels of mortality (Joern & Klucas 1993, Belovsky & Slade 1995) and undeveloped ovaries (D. Branson unpub. data). No field experiments have examined the separate effects of nymphal and adult resource availability on patterns of reproductive allocation, and few experiments have examined if M. sanguinipes females respond to variation in host plant availability by changing patterns of oosorption and vitellogenesis (Branson 2003b). A better understanding of the relative effects that nymphal and adult resource availabilities have on reproductive allocation is needed, given the potentially important implications for the prediction of grasshopper population dynamics (Joern 2000).

Materials and Methods

I conducted the experiment at the National Bison Range in northwestern Montana, USA, at an elevation of 800 m. The study site consisted of Palouse prairie with plant biomass highly dominated by grasses (Belovsky & Slade 1995). The dominant grass species were Agropyron spicatum (Pursh) Scribn. & J.G. Sm., Pascopyrum smithii Rydberg (syn. Agropyron smithii Rydberg) and Poa pratensis L., while common forbs included Achillea millefolium L., Aster falcatus Lindl. and Erigeron sp. The most common grasshoppers at the site were M. sanguinipes, M. femurrubrum (DeGeer) and Ageneotettix deorum (Scudder). M. sanguinipes was used in the experiment and is one of the most common species of rangeland grasshopper in western North America (Pfadt 2002). Melanoplus sanguinipes is polyphagous, reproductively plastic (Branson 2003a, b), and lays egg pods ranging from 1 to 36 eggs in the area of the study site (D. Branson unpub. data). In Montana, M. sanguinipes has a univoltine life cycle.

The experiment consisted of a 2 × 2 factorial design with 2 nymphal and adult resource treatments. The 2 nymphal rearing resource availability treatments are designated for simplicity as “high” and “low”, while the 2 adult host plant availability treatments are designated as ambient-level and watered. I collected early instar M. sanguinipes at the experimental site, separated them by sex, and reared them in outdoor insect cages until adult. Low nymphal resource availability female nymphs received approximately 0.5g wet mass of romaine lettuce per individual every 2 d, which was designed to create food limitation for developing nymphs. High resource female nymphs received ad libitum romaine lettuce daily. To minimize the potential influence of male condition on female reproduction (Belovsky et al. 1996), all male nymphs were reared on ad libitum romaine lettuce. All uneaten food was removed daily from the cages. Romaine lettuce was used as the nymphal rearing food to eliminate nematode parasitism previously encountered when rearing grasshoppers with field vegetation (Belovsky et al. 1997).

I placed 0.1m2 basal area cages, with a height of 0.9m, over similar patches of natural vegetation. The cages were constructed of aluminum screening fastened at the base to aluminum garden edging buried in the ground (Belovsky & Slade 1995, Joern & Klucas 1993). Cage effects on microclimate are minimal (Belovsky & Slade 1993). Adult resource availability was supplemented by adding 250 ml of water every other day to the watered treatment cages, which was double the long term average precipitation during the period of the study. The watered resource treatment was designed to examine the effects of increased per capita adult resource availability on life history variation with minimal changes in resource quality. Ambient-level treatment cages received no additions. I randomly assigned treatments to cages and initiated the adult resource treatment one week prior to stocking. There were 10 replicates of each treatment combination and 5 vegetation control cages without grasshoppers for both adult resource treatments.

Prior to initiating the field experiment, I randomly chose females from each nymphal rearing resource treatment and measured the phenotypic characteristics of femur length and body mass. Femur length has been hypothesized to reflect nymphal environmental conditions, with body mass representative of adult condition (Wall & Begon 1987). Two male and 2 female M. sanguinipes grasshoppers were added to each cage, which was below the average long-term carrying capacity at the site when adjusted for vegetative cover (Belovsky & Slade 1995). The initial density was chosen to minimize strong density-dependent effects on survival and reproduction, while allowing an examination of reproductive allocation responses to resource limitation. I counted the adult resource treatment cages and accounted for all individuals in each cage daily to determine grasshopper survival (Belovsky & Slade 1995). I maintained an even sex ratio throughout the experiment by adding or removing males, as mating frequency has been shown to affect reproductive effort and female survival (Pickford & Gillot 1972).

Diet-induced phenotypic plasticity in mandible structure has been demonstrated with Melanoplus femurrubrum (Thompson 1999). To examine if rearing nymphs on romaine lettuce affected the survival and reproduction of female M. sanguinipes foraging on field vegetation in cages, I caught newly eclosed females which had not mated and stocked them in field cages, following the protocol described above. Survival and reproduction of adults did not vary between females reared on romaine lettuce and field-caught newly eclosed females (ANOVA, p > 0.6).

I clipped green vegetation in each treatment and control cage at the end of the experiment and separated it by grasses and forbs. I dried, weighed, and ground vegetation samples. I then assessed nutritional quality of grasses by acid-pepsin digestion (Terry & Tilley 1964, Bailey & Mukerji 1976). Acid-pepsin digestion is correlated with in vivo digestibility of vegetation by grasshoppers and serves as a measure of plant nutritional quality for grasshoppers (Belovsky & Slade 1995). I did not examine forb nutritional quality due to the limited number of cages where sufficient forb biomass remained at the end of the experiment.

At the end of the experiment (late September), I removed and froze all surviving adults. I measured reproductive characteristics through ovary analysis using a dissecting microscope (Launois-Luong 1978; Joern & Klucas 1993; Branson 2003a, b). When an egg is released into the oviduct, the covering of the egg compresses into a visible band called the follicular relict. A brightly colored resorption body is apparent when an ovarian follicle stops development and nutrients are reallocated from the follicle. For each female, I determined total per capita egg production by counting the number of follicular relicts present in the ovarioles of a given female. The total number of ovarioles initiating vitellogenesis was calculated by combining the numbers of follicular relicts and resorbed ovarian follicles. I also counted the number of functional or developing ovarioles, which is an indication of the size of the next egg pod to be laid had the experiment not been terminated.

I used unequal sample size ANOVA models to examine nymphal and adult resource treatment effects on vegetation characteristics. Due to low forb biomass in cages, I used Chi-Square analysis to examine if the presence or absence or forbs differed between ambient-level and watered resource level treatments. I used logistic regression analysis to examine if the nymphal and adult resource treatments affected whether 0, 1, or 2 females survived to the end of the experiment. I used multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) to assess overall treatment effects on both reproductive allocation characteristics and prestocking measurements, because multiple characteristics were measured on individual grasshoppers (Zar 1999). If a MANOVA model was significant, univariate analyses of variance were used to assess treatment differences on individual reproductive characteristics or prestocking measurements (Zar 1999). Cages where no females survived to the end of the experiment were not utilized for reproductive analyses. Vegetation data were log-transformed as necessary to normalize values. I used cage means as replicate values for all analyses, as the experiment was designed to examine per capita reproductive responses. I used SYSTAT 10 (SPSS Inc. 2000) for all statistical analyses.

Results

Nymphal resource availability significantly affected phenotypic characteristics of females prior to stocking, based on a multivariate analysis (Table 1). Females reared with higher resource availability had a greater body mass than females reared with lower resource availability (Table 1). There was a marginal positive effect of increased nymphal resource availability on adult femur length (Table 1).

Both grass biomass and the percentage digestibility of grass were lower when grasshoppers were present than in vegetation control cages (Table 2). When grasshoppers were present, watered treatment cages had higher biomass, but similar plant quality, as ambient-level treatment cages (Table 2). Averaged across all treatments, total green biomass at the end of the experiment was composed of over 90% grass biomass. When treatment cages with grasshoppers were analyzed for the presence or absence of forbs, fewer cages in the ambient-level resource treatment had forbs present than in the watered resource treatment (Χ2 = 21.665, p < 0.001). All watered treatment cages with grasshoppers had forbs present, and all control cages in both treatments had forbs present.

Nymphal resource availability treatments did not significantly affect whether 0, 1 or 2 females survived to the end of the experiment (Logistic Regression: Wald Chi-Square = 1.755, p = 0.185). In addition, female survival was not significantly affected by the adult resource treatments (Logistic Regression: Wald Chi-Square = 0.479, p = 0.488). Based on a multivariate analysis, reproductive characteristics of M. sanguinipes females were not significantly affected by nymphal resource treatments (Table 3). However, adult resource availability significantly affected reproductive characteristics of M. sanguinipes (Table 3). Females in the watered treatment laid approximately 68% more eggs than females in the ambient-level treatment, as measured by numbers of follicular relicts (Fig. 1A, Table 3). Functional ovariole number was higher in watered adult resource females (Fig. 1B, Table 3), indicating that the next egg pod to be produced in the watered treatment, had the experiment not been terminated, would have been approximately 58% larger. Since vitellogenesis was not affected by adult resource availability (Fig. 1C, Table 3), while egg production was (Fig. 1A), females in the watered treatment completed development of a higher percentage of ovarioles initiating vitellogenesis (follicular relicts/vitellogenesis) (Fig. 1D). Therefore, grasshoppers did not significantly increase their rate of vitellogenesis in response to increased host plant availability, but more frequently completed development of eggs. Nymphal and adult resource availabilities did not significantly interact in their effects on either reproductive allocation (Table 3) or female survival (Logistic Regression: Wald Chi-Square = 0.0159, p = 0.900). As a result, females reared with low nymphal resource availability did not exhibit additional reductions in survival or reproduction when stocked as adults in ambient-level treatment cages.

Discussion

Impact of Nymphal Resource Availability

Although nymphal resource availability was positively related to grasshopper mass, with a marginal effect on femur length (Table 1), this did not translate into differences in adult survival or reproduction (Table 3). Femur length has been hypothesized to reflect nymphal environmental conditions (Wall & Begon 1987), and femur length was shorter in the low nymphal resource treatment. However, there was no indication that the smaller structural size of females reared with lower resource availability was associated with reduced reproductive allocation. M. sanguinipes females reared with low nymphal resource availability did not have a higher percentage of undeveloped ovarioles (Fig. 1B), and there were no indications of an increased preoviposition period. As reduced resource availability during nymphal rearing did not affect the reproductive allocation of females surviving until adults, it appears resource allocation to reproduction was not significant until M. sanguinipes were adults. Although M. sanguinipes females appeared to both acquire and allocate resources to reproduction once adults (Moehrlin and Juliano 1998, Hatle et al. 2004), females reared with low nymphal resources could have also compensated for nutritional deficiencies by modifying patterns of food intake, either during nymphal rearing or after females were placed in field cages. Grasshoppers and locusts can compensate for diet deficiencies by increasing consumption, modifying food selection, and modifying postingestive processes (Reviewed in Bernays & Simpson 1990, Simpson et al. 1995). In addition, inherited environmental effects resulting from nymphal resource availability, could affect life history characteristics of M. sanguinipes offspring in the following year, but were not examined (Smith 1972, Rossiter 1996).

Adult Resource Availability

Less grass biomass remained in cages with grasshoppers present than in vegetation control cages (Table 2), indicating that grasshopper herbivory reduced vegetative biomass throughout the experiment. The percentage digestibility of grass was lower in cages with grasshoppers present than in vegetation control cages (Table 2), which is consistent with grasshoppers selectively removing the highest quality portions of plants (Chapman 1990). M. sanguinipes is a polyphagous species, feeding on a number of grasses and forbs (Pfadt 2002). Since forbs were present in all cages in all control cages and in all watered treatment cages with grasshoppers, but in less than 30% of the cages with grasshoppers in the ambient-level treatment, M. sanguinipes appeared to have actively foraged on limited forb biomass. The combined biomass, abundance and quality results are consistent with grasshoppers being food-limited during the experiment, even though the experiment was initiated below the carrying capacity. Branson (2003b), in an experiment with M. sanguinipes at a nearby site, demonstrated that exploitative competition for high quality resources occurred even when grass biomass was abundant.

Grass biomass at the end of the experiment was more abundant in watered treatment cages, but the percent digestibility of grass did not differ significantly between resource treatments (Table 2). Forbs can be a high nutritional content food source, and forb availability was also higher in the watered treatment. These results demonstrate that the watering treatment increased host-plant availability during the experiment, while not significantly affecting grass quality. The addition of water in prairie systems frequently results in increased grass biomass and reduced nitrogen content (Mattson & Haack 1987, Belovsky & Slade 1995, Joern & Mole forthcoming), presumably due to nitrogen limitation. However, environmental conditions appear to interact with water additions in their effects on nitrogen content, which can lead to variable results between years (Belovsky & Slade 1995, Joern & Mole in press). Levels of water addition higher than those used in this experiment would likely result in reduced nitrogen content of grasses. In summary, the decreased presence of forbs in ambient-level treatment cages and increased grass biomass in watered control cages indicate that the watered treatment increased host-plant availability of both grasses and forbs.

Impact of Adult Resource Availability

Although there was no relationship between nymphal or adult resource treatments and whether 0, 1 or 2 females survived in a cage, the detection of statistically significant differences would be unlikely given the initial density of 2 females per cage. The adult resource treatments were initiated below the long-term carrying capacity, to allow an examination of food limitation effects on reproductive allocation, while avoiding strong exploitative competition and density-dependent mortality. As a result, conclusions regarding the effects of resource availability on patterns of mortality are unwarranted.

Female M. sanguinipes grasshoppers responded to the increased host plant availability in the watered treatment by increasing reproduction allocation over the course of the experiment. Nymphal and adult resource availabilities did not interact in their effects on reproductive allocation (Table 3). Egg production in M. sanguinipes was higher in the watered treatment (Table 3, Fig. 1A), indicating that resource availability in the ambient-level treatment appeared limiting to reproduction. The higher egg production in the watered treatment could have been in response to either the increased grass biomass or availability of forbs. Even when grass biomass appeared abundant, Branson (2003b) found per capita resource availability explained over 60% of the variation in egg production in M. sanguinipes. Female M. sanguinipes in the watered treatment did not increase the initiation rate of follicles (vitellogenesis), but completed development of a higher percentage of ovarioles that initiated development (Table 3, Fig. 1C, D). Even if the amount of energy recovered by resorbing oocytes is small, future resource demands for reproduction would be significantly reduced for females in the ambient-level resource treatment, allowing resources to be allocated to survival (Branson 2001). Because M. sanguinipes often only produces 1 to 3 egg pods under field conditions (Branson 2003b), reductions in vitellogenesis in the ambient-level resource treatment would likely occur only under more severe food limitation than occurred in this study. Functional ovariole number, an indication of future reproduction, was higher in females in the watered resource treatment (Table 3, Fig. 1B), further evidence that females in the ambient-level treatment were food-limited at the end of the experiment. As a result, females with higher host plant availability from watering would continue to lay a higher percentage of the eggs initiated.

Conclusion

Grasshoppers with lower food availability as nymphs had similar reproduction to those who experienced high food availability while nymphs, regardless of adult resource availability. Female M. sanguinipes responded to increased adult resource availability by increasing reproductive allocation, even when initiated below the average carrying capacity at the site. Reduced nymphal food availability likely affects grasshopper population dynamics in ways that were not addressed by this study, as reduced per capita resource availability leads to increased nymphal mortality rates (Belovsky & Slade (1995) and development times (Danner & Joern 2004). Danner and Joern (2004) found resource limitation for nymphal A. deorum grasshoppers led to delayed development and indirectly reduced total reproduction. Resource dynamics in semi-arid grasslands can change rapidly due to precipitation throughout the period when nymphal grasshoppers are developing (Joern 2000). However, these results indicate that there were no direct residual effects of limited resource availability for developing nymphs that subsequently affected per capita reproduction of adults.

Acknowledgments

Gary Belovsky, Jon Chase and Jennifer Slade provided assistance in the field. I wish to thank Gary Belovsky, Dave Kazmer, Gene Schupp, Tom Shanower and 2 anonymous reviewers for their comments on this manuscript.

Literature Cited

1.

D. Atkinson and M. Begon . 1987. Ecological correlates and heritability of reproductive variation in two co-occuring grasshopper species. Ecological Entomology 12:129–138. Google Scholar

2.

C. G. Bailey and M. K. Mukerji . 1976. Consumption and utilization of various host plants by Melanoplus bivittatus (Say) and M. femurrubrum (DeGeer) (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 54:1044–1050. Google Scholar

3.

R. G. Bellinger, F. W. Ravlin, and R. L. Pienkowski . 1987. Maternal environment and variation in ovariole number among populations of Melanoplus femurubrum and M. scudderi scudderi. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 44:75–80. Google Scholar

4.

G. E. Belovsky and J. B. Slade . 1993. The role of vertebrate and invertebrate predators in a grasshopper community. Oikos 68:193–201. Google Scholar

5.

G. E. Belovsky and J. B. Slade . 1995. Dynamics of two Montana grasshopper populations: relationships among weather, food abundance and intraspecific competition. Oecologia 101:383–396. Google Scholar

6.

G. E. Belovsky, J. B. Slade, and J. M. Chase . 1996. Mating strategies based on foraging ability: an experiment with grasshoppers. Behavioral Ecology 7:438–444. Google Scholar

7.

G. E. Belovsky, D. H. Branson, J. M. Chase, and G. Hammond . 1997. Mite and nematode parasites of grasshoppers. pp. I.9.1–I.9.3. In: Grasshopper Integrated Pest Management User Handbook. USDA/APHIS Technical Bulletin 1809. Google Scholar

8.

E. A. Bernays and S. J. Simpson . 1990. Nutrition. pp. 105–127. In Chapman R.F., Joern, A. (Eds) Biology of Grasshoppers. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Google Scholar

9.

E. A. Bernays and R. F. Chapman . 1994. Host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. Chapman & Hall, New York, NY. Google Scholar

10.

D. H. Branson 2001. Reproductive allocation and survival in grasshoppers: Effects of resource availability, grasshopper density, and parasitism. Ph. D. Dissertation. Utah State University, Logan. Google Scholar

11.

D. H. Branson 2003a. Effects of a parasite mite on life-history variation in two grasshopper species. Evolutionary Ecology Research 5:397–409. Google Scholar

12.

D. H. Branson 2003b. Reproduction and survival in Melanoplus sanguinipes (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in response to resource availability and population density: the role of exploitative competition. Canadian Entomologist 135:415–426. Google Scholar

13.

R. F. Chapman 1990. Food Selection. pp. 39–72. In: Chapman R.F., Joern, A. (Eds) Biology of Grasshoppers. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Google Scholar

14.

R. F. Chapman 1998. The Insects: Structure and Function, 4th Ed. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar

15.

B. J. Danner and A. Joern . 2004. Development, growth, and egg production of Ageneotettix deorum (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in response to spider predation risk and elevated resource quality. Ecological Entomology 29:1–11. Google Scholar

16.

P. de Souza Santos and M. Begon . 1987. Survival costs in grasshoppers. Functional Ecology 1:215–221. Google Scholar

17.

J. D. Hatle, D. W. Borst, and S. A. Juliano . 2004. Plasticity and canalization in the control of reproduction in the lubber grasshopper. Integrative and Comparative Biology 43:635–645. Google Scholar

18.

G. B. Hewitt 1985. Review of factors affecting fecundity, oviposition, and egg survival of grasshoppers in North America. USDA-ARS Service Bulletin 36. Google Scholar

19.

A. Joern 2000. What are the consequences of non-linear ecological interactions for grasshopper control strategies? pp. 131–144. In: Lockwood J.A., Latchininsky A.V., Sergeev M.G. (Eds) Grasshoppers and Grassland Health. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London. Google Scholar

20.

A. Joern and G. Klucas . 1993. Intra- and interspecific competition between two abundant grasshopper species (Orthoptera: Acrididae) from a sandhills grassland. Environmental Entomology 22:352–361. Google Scholar

21.

A. Joern and S. T. Behmer . 1997. Importance of dietary nitrogen and carbohydrates to survival, growth, and reproduction in adults of the grasshopper Ageneotettix deorum (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Oecologia 112:201–208. Google Scholar

22.

A. Joern and S. T. Behmer . 1998. Impact of diet quality on demographic attributes in adult grasshoppers and the nitrogen limitation hypothesis. Ecological Entomology 23:174–184. Google Scholar

23.

A. Joern and S. Mole . forthcoming. The plant stress hypothesis and variable responses by Blue Grama grass (Bouteloua gracilis) to water, mineral nitrogen and insect herbivory. Journal of Chemical Ecology.  Google Scholar

24.

M. H. Launois-Luong 1978. Methode pratique d'interpretation de l'etat des ovaires des acridens du Sahel. Annales de Zoologie, Écologie Animale 10:569–587. Google Scholar

25.

J. H. MacFarlane and A. J. Thorsteinson . 1980. Development and survival of the two-striped grasshopper, Melanoplus bivittatus (Say) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) on various single and multiple plant diets. Acrida 9:63–76. Google Scholar

26.

W. J. Mattson and R. A. Haack . 1987. The role of drought in outbreaks of plant-eating insects. Bioscience 37:110–118. Google Scholar

27.

G. S. Moehrlin and S. A. Juliano . 1998. Plasticity of insect reproduction: Testing models of flexible and fixed development in response to different growth rates. Oecologia 115:492–500. Google Scholar

28.

S. Nylin and K. Gotthard . 1998. Plasticity in life-history traits. Annual Review of Entomology 43:63–83. Google Scholar

29.

D. R. Papaj 2000. Ovarian dynamics and host use. Annual Review of Entomology 45:423–448. Google Scholar

30.

R. E. Pfadt 2002. Field guide to common western grasshoppers, 3rd Ed. Wyoming Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 912. Google Scholar

31.

R. Pickford and C. Gillott . 1972. Coupling behaviour of the migratory grasshopper, Melanoplus sanguinipes (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Canadian Entomologist 104:873–879. Google Scholar

32.

M. Rossiter 1996. Incidence and consequences of inherited environmental effects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27:451–476. Google Scholar

33.

N. E. Sanchez, J. A. Onsager, and W. P. Kemp . 1988. Fecundity of Melanoplus sanguinipes (F.) in two crested wheatgrass pastures. Canadian Entomologist 120:29–37. Google Scholar

34.

S. J. Simpson, D. Raubenheimer, and P. G. Chambers . 1995. The mechanisms of nutritional homeostasis. pp. 251–278. In: Chapman R.F., de Boer G. (Eds) Regulatory Mechanisms in Insect Feeding. Chapman and Hall. New York. Google Scholar

35.

D. S. Smith 1972. Crowding in grasshoppers. II. Continuing effects of crowding on subsequent generations of Melanoplus sanguinipes (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Environmental Entomology 1:314–317. Google Scholar

36.

SPSS Inc 2000. Systat 10. SPSS Incorporated, Chicago. Google Scholar

37.

T. W. Stauffer and D. W. Whitman . 1997. Grasshopper Oviposition. pp. 103–128. In: Gangwere S.K., Muralirangan M.C., Muralirangan, M. (Eds) The Bionomics of Grasshoppers, Katydids and Their Kin. CABI., New York. Google Scholar

38.

R. A. Terry and J. M. A. Tilley . 1964. The digestibility of the leaves and stems of perennial ryegrass, cocksfoot, timothy, tall fescue, lucerne and sainfoin as measured by an in vivo procedure. Journal of the British Grassland Society 19:363–372. Google Scholar

39.

D. B. Thompson 1999. Genotype-environment interaction and the ontogeny of diet-induced phenotypic plasticity in size and shape of Melanoplus femurrubrum (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12:38–48. Google Scholar

40.

R. Wall and M. Begon . 1987. Population density, phenotype, and reproductive output in the grasshopper Chorthippus brunneus. Ecological Entomology 12:331–339. Google Scholar

41.

J. H. Zar 1999. Biostatistical Analysis, 4th Ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. Google Scholar

Fig. 1.

Reproductive allocation in response to nymphal and adult resource availability treatments for females surviving to the end of the experiment. All results are based on per capita cage averages. Values are means ±1 s. A. Average number of follicular relicts (eggs laid). B. Average number of functional ovarioles. C. Average number of follicles initiating vitellogenesis. D. Average proportion of initiated follicles completing development (follicular relicts/vitellogenesis).

i1082-6467-13-2-239-f01.gif

Table 1.

A) Statistical results of female phenotypic characteristics. B) Mean and standard deviation values for femur length (mm) and body mass (g) from prestocking phenotypic measurements of female grasshoppers in high and low nymphal rearing treatments.

i1082-6467-13-2-239-t01.gif

Table 2.

A) ANOVA results for green grass biomass and percent digestibility of grass remaining in cages at the end of the experiment. B) Mean values for total grass biomass (g dry/m2) and percent digestibility of grass at the end of the experiment for each adult resource and grasshopper herbivory treatment combination.

i1082-6467-13-2-239-t02.gif

Table 3.

Statistical results of per capita reproduction-related parameters for females removed at the end of the experiment. All results are based on per capita cage averages.

i1082-6467-13-2-239-t03.gif
David H. Branson "Relative importance of nymphal and adult resource availability for reproductive allocation in Melanoplus sanguinipes (Orthoptera: Acrididae)," Journal of Orthoptera Research 13(2), 239-245, (1 December 2004). https://doi.org/10.1665/1082-6467(2004)013[0239:RIONAA]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 December 2004
KEYWORDS
grasshopper
life history variation
Melanoplus sanguinipes
reproduction
resource availability
Back to Top